| Review of 
		Nelson, Gerald (ed.) and Justin Buckley (graphics 
		and design), 
		
		Landmarks in English Grammar: The Eighteenth Century. 
		 (HSL/SHL 1) Fully indexed 
		electronic editions of five eighteenth-century English grammars. Survey 
		of English Usage, University College London.
		£29.37 –117.50 (ranging from student licence to 
		institutional network licence in Great Britain or other EU countries). Landmarks in English Grammar. The 
		Eighteenth Century is a CD-ROM 
		published by the Survey of English Usage, University College London, 
		edited by Gerald Nelson (with graphics and design by Justin Buckley). It 
		contains five eighteenth-century grammars of English, those by 
		Brightland and Gildon (1711), Priestley (1761), Lowth (1762), Ash (4th 
		ed., 1763) and Murray (1795). The grammars were selected, according to 
		the editor in his very brief introduction, "for their importance in the 
		history of English grammar, for their contemporary influence, and for 
		their influence on later writers". The qualification of these grammars 
		as "classic" works and hence as "landmarks" is not, however, 
		self-evident in all five cases. Lowth and Murray were an obvious choice, 
		Lowth because he is often regarded as the epitome of normative grammar 
		writing in the eighteenth century and Murray because of the enormous 
		popularity he enjoyed for much of a century after the grammar was first 
		published. The selection of Priestley is interesting because of the 
		opposite views he often took compared to his contemporary Lowth with 
		regard to the importance of actual usage as a guide to propriety in 
		matters of language. The grammar by Brightland and Gildon was included 
		because of the controversy surrounding its authorship – it has at times 
		been attributed to Sir Richard Steele – and to illustrate "the 
		continuing influence of the Port-Royal Grammaire Générale" (Introduction). 
		Greenwood, however, whose grammar was also published in 1711, would have 
		been an equally likely choice, because it owes much to the 
		seventeenth-century truly "classic" Wallis (1653) and consequently shows 
		the continuing influence of Wallis on eighteenth-century grammar writing, 
		down to the middle of the century. By that time, Johnson has taken over 
		from Greenwood in this respect, in that Wallis was the major source for 
		the grammar which he published in 1755 prefixed to the Dictionary. The choice of Ash is interesting, not 
		because he was a "classic", but because of how he adapted his grammar, 
		which had first come out in 1760 under the title Grammatical 
		Institutes: or grammar, adapted to the genius of the English tongue, 
		to being "an easy introduction to Dr. Lowth’s English Grammar", as its 
		new subtitle runs. The CD-ROM reproduces the fourth edition of the 
		grammar because according to R.C. Alston’s Bibliography of the 
		English Language (Vol. 1, English Grammars written in English, 
		Leeds: E.J. Arnold & Son, 1965) no copy of the first adapted edition of 
		1763 has been located. The fourth edition has only tentatively been 
		dated 1763(?), though this has not been indicated on the CD-ROM. The 
		publication of Ash alongside with Lowth enables the user of the CD-ROM 
		to study in detail to what extent the revised grammar was indeed any 
		easier than Lowth’s, though it is unfortunate in this respect that the 
		first edition of Lowth’s grammar has been reproduced here instead of the 
		second, also of 1763. There are reasons to believe that Lowth had 
		intended his first edition as a kind of pilot version, which would be 
		improved on the basis of comments from his readers. Suggestions for 
		improvement are, indeed, what he asks for on p. xv of his Preface, and 
		it is for this reason that Reibel reprinted the second edition in 
		Lowth’s Major Works (1995). The grammars on the CD-ROM are 
		represented in the form of digitised images; it is unfortunate that, as 
		in the case of the CD-ROM version of Dr Johnson’s Dictionary (ed. 
		Ann McDermott, CUP, 1996), no electronic version of the text has been 
		provided as well, as this would have allowed for more precise as well as 
		for different search facilities. As it is, the indexes, which are the 
		main feature of the CD-ROM, only take one to the page in question, not 
		to the item one is looking for. It must be said in favour of the 
		decision not to digitise the text of the grammars that the price of the 
		CD-ROM has been kept at only about one-tenth of that of Johnson’s 
		Dictionary: this brings it into the buying range of a much wider 
		public than libraries alone. Consequently, the CD-ROM may easily be 
		introduced as a teaching tool, as a result of which the study of 
		eighteenth-century grammar writing may well receive a great stimulus. The CD-ROM also contains a select 
		bibliography, with, however, no more than 25 items. Among these there 
		are indeed the standard general works such as Alston’s bibliography, but 
		what is missing is a reference to Alston’s series of microfiche 
		reprints, English Linguistics 1500–1800 (The Scolar Press, 1974), 
		where other eighteenth-century grammars might be found and consulted. 
		More serious is the absence in the bibliography of studies dealing with 
		the grammars and grammarians themselves. Especially Lowth and Murray 
		have been the subject of a lot of recent study, and the value of the 
		CD-ROM would be greatly increased if the user were able to view a 
		particular grammar in the context of research already carried out. What 
		is more, there are also somewhat older studies which anyone interested 
		in a particular grammar would benefit from reading, such as G.K. Pullum 
		("Lowth’s Grammar: A Re-evaluation", Linguistics 137, 1974, 
		63–78) and Emma Vorlat ("The Sources of Lindley Murray’s ‘The English 
		Grammar’", Leuvense Bijdragen 48, 1959, 108–125). A complete 
		bibliography would also have shown that an index of Lowth has already 
		been in existence for some time: S.W. Reid, "An Index to Robert Lowth’s 
		Short Introduction to English Grammar", Studia Neophilologica 49, 
		1977, 135–137). Reid’s index differs in a number of respects from the 
		one on the CD-ROM, for one thing because it also contains references to 
		individual prepositions and verbs. The publication of the CD-ROM index 
		therefore does not replace the earlier one, which remains of value 
		because of the wider possibilities it offers. Some recommendations might therefore be 
		made: to publish a revised version of the CD-ROM with a fuller, 
		up-to-date bibliography containing studies relating to the individual 
		grammars. To do so would show, for example, that Ash has not yet been 
		the subject of much scholarly research; that he deserves to be has 
		already been indicated above. Alternatively, an interactive CD-ROM might 
		be published which would offer the possibility of obtaining access to an 
		on-line bibliography of studies on the five grammars. A second 
		recommendation would be not to leave it at this single CD-ROM for the 
		eighteenth century as a whole: a second Volume of Landmarks 
		might, indeed, contain Greenwood’s grammar of 1711, and in addition 
		Webster (1784) because of its rivalry with Murray’s grammar in the 
		United States, Fisher (2nd ed. 1750) as the first grammar by 
		a female author (Alston lists over thirty editions and reprints of the 
		book), Kirkby (1746) because parts of it were copied straight from the 
		first edition of Fisher without acknowledgement, and Buchanan (1762) 
		because, like Lowth’s grammar, its publication represents an effort on 
		the part of the London booksellers to make a bid for the new market in 
		practical grammars of English. To what extent these grammars had any 
		chance of success can only be assessed after a detailed comparison, 
		which would be greatly facilitated by their publication on CD-ROM. Publications like the Landmarks 
		CD-ROM suggest all kinds of other possibilities for further research. To 
		conclude with one example: Ash, Lowth and Murray were all translated 
		into German, Ash and Lowth possibly by the same man, Christian Heinrich 
		Reichel. A CD-ROM with the three grammars alongside their German 
		translations (none of which are as easily available as their originals) 
		would enable us to study the beginnings of the development of English as 
		a world language. As a new medium, the CD-ROM offers invaluable 
		opportunities for the study of the historiography of the English 
		language. Ingrid Tieken-Boon van Ostade, 
		University of Leiden For another review of the 
		Landmarks CD-ROM, by Masataka Miyawaki, click
		here. 
		Contact the reviewer. |